May/June 2025 Paper 61 Worked Answers (A-Level Maths 9709 A2)
11 questions · 50 marks · 75 minutes
Question papers and mark schemes are copyright Cambridge International. We do not reproduce them: the worked answers here are written by The Practice Book. Have the paper open alongside. Get the official paper from Cambridge
Step 1:X∼B(400,0.01). Since n is large and p small (with np=4), use the Poisson approximation X≈Po(4). Step 2:P(X≤3)=e−4(0!40+1!41+2!42+3!43)=e−4(1+4+8+332). Step 3: Sum inside the bracket: 1+4+8+10.667=23.667. Step 4:e−4=0.018316, so P(X≤3)=0.018316×23.667=0.433 (3 s.f.).
Method:
Identify the Poisson approximation conditions, compute λ=np, then sum the discrete Poisson probabilities up to the required value.
Examiner tips
Conditions for Poisson approximation: n large and p small, e.g. n>50 and np<5.
Sum from k=0 up to and including the upper bound for P(X≤3).
Step 1: For X∼B(8,43): E(X)=np=6 and Var(X)=np(1−p)=8⋅43⋅41=1.5. Step 2: By the Central Limit Theorem, Xˉ∼N(6,1001.5)=N(6,0.015), so sd(Xˉ)=0.015=0.1225. Step 3: Standardise: z=0.12256.2−6=0.12250.2=1.633. Step 4:P(Xˉ≥6.2)=1−Φ(1.633)=1−0.9488=0.0512 (3 s.f.).
Method:
Find μ and σ2 for X, then use Xˉ∼N(μ,σ2/n) via the CLT and standardise to get the upper-tail probability.
Step 1: Hypotheses: H0:μ=45 vs H1:μ>45 (one-tailed, upper). Step 2: Test statistic: z=s2/ntˉ−μ0=16.243/6045.833−45=0.27070.833=0.52030.833=1.602. Step 3: Critical value at 5% for upper tail: zcrit=1.645. Step 4: Compare: 1.602<1.645, so the test statistic is not in the rejection region. Do not reject H0. Step 5: Conclusion: there is insufficient evidence at the 5% level to support the passenger's belief that μ>45.
Method:
State hypotheses, compute the z test statistic, compare with the appropriate critical value, and conclude in context.
Examiner tips
For an upper one-tailed test at 5%, the critical value is 1.645.
State the conclusion in context — non-definite language ('insufficient evidence').
Step 1:C=0.4T is a linear function of T with a=0.4 and b=0. Step 2:E(C)=E(0.4T)=0.4E(T)=0.4×15=6 dollars. Step 3:Var(C)=Var(0.4T)=0.42Var(T)=0.16×9. Step 4:Var(C)=1.44.
Method:
Apply E(aT+b)=aE(T)+b and Var(aT+b)=a2Var(T) to the linear cost function.
Step 1:T35=∑i=135Ci where the Ci are independent and identically distributed with E(Ci)=6 and Var(Ci)=1.44. Step 2: Expectation: E(T35)=35E(Ci)=35×6=210. Step 3: Variance (of a sum of independents): Var(T35)=35Var(Ci)=35×1.44=50.4. Step 4: So mean =210 dollars, variance =50.4.
Method:
Apply linearity of expectation and variance-of-independent-sum to compute total mean and total variance.
Examiner tips
Var(X1+X2+…+Xn)=nVar(X) when the Xi are i.i.d.
Be careful: Var(nX)=n2Var(X) — different scenario.
Step 1: Sum of independent Poissons: S∼Po(100⋅1.2+200⋅2.3)=Po(580). With λ large, approximate by N(580,580). Step 2:P(S>600)=P(S≥601). With continuity correction, this is P(N≥600.5). Step 3: Standardise: z=580600.5−580=24.08320.5=0.851. Step 4:P(N≥600.5)=1−Φ(0.851)=1−0.8027=0.1973≈0.197 (3 s.f.).
Method:
Combine the Poissons, approximate by N(λ,λ), apply continuity correction for the strict inequality, standardise and use the upper tail.
Step 1: Substitute the Poisson p.m.f.: 25⋅3!e−μμ3+4!e−μμ4=5!e−μμ5. Step 2: Multiply through by e−μμ35! to remove e−μ and μ3: 25⋅6120+24120μ=120120μ2, which simplifies to 50+5μ=μ2. Step 3: Rearrange: μ2−5μ−50=0. Step 4: Factorise: (μ−10)(μ+5)=0, so μ=10 or μ=−5. Since μ>0, μ=10.
Method:
Substitute the Poisson formula, cancel common factors, and solve the quadratic for μ.
Examiner tips
Factorise out e−μμk for the smallest k to simplify the equation.
Reject the negative root because μ is a Poisson parameter.
Step 1: Type II error occurs when H0 is not rejected even though the true p=0.25. Here, with rejection region X<5, H0 is not rejected when X≥5. Step 2: Under the true proportion p=0.10, X∼B(30,0.1), so β=P(X≥5). Step 3: Compute P(X≤4): (030)(0.9)30=0.04239; (130)(0.1)(0.9)29=0.14130; (230)(0.1)2(0.9)28=0.22765; (330)(0.1)3(0.9)27=0.23609; (430)(0.1)4(0.9)26=0.17707. Sum =0.82451. Step 4:β=1−0.82451=0.1755≈0.175 (3 s.f.).
Method:
Compute the probability of NOT rejecting H0 under the true proportion using the binomial cumulative distribution.
Examiner tips
Type II error uses the TRUE distribution, not the null distribution.
Read the rejection region carefully: X<5 means reject for X≤4, retain for X≥5.