← All A-Level Maths 9709 A2 past papers
    A2
    CAIE | A Level

    Mathematics (9709)

    May/June 2025 Paper 61 Worked Answers (A-Level Maths 9709 A2)

    11 questions · 50 marks · 75 minutes

    Question papers and mark schemes are copyright Cambridge International. We do not reproduce them: the worked answers here are written by The Practice Book. Have the paper open alongside. Get the official paper from Cambridge

    Worked answers for 11 questions
    1. Step 1: XB(400,0.01)X \sim B(400, 0.01). Since nn is large and pp small (with np=4np = 4), use the Poisson approximation XPo(4)X \approx Po(4). Step 2: P(X3)=e4 ⁣(400!+411!+422!+433!)=e4 ⁣(1+4+8+323)P(X \le 3) = e^{-4}\!\left(\dfrac{4^0}{0!} + \dfrac{4^1}{1!} + \dfrac{4^2}{2!} + \dfrac{4^3}{3!}\right) = e^{-4}\!\left(1 + 4 + 8 + \dfrac{32}{3}\right). Step 3: Sum inside the bracket: 1+4+8+10.667=23.6671 + 4 + 8 + 10.667 = 23.667. Step 4: e4=0.018316e^{-4} = 0.018316, so P(X3)=0.018316×23.667=0.433P(X \le 3) = 0.018316 \times 23.667 = 0.433 (3 s.f.).
      Method:
      Identify the Poisson approximation conditions, compute λ=np\lambda = np, then sum the discrete Poisson probabilities up to the required value.
      Examiner tips
      • Conditions for Poisson approximation: nn large and pp small, e.g. n>50n > 50 and np<5np < 5.
      • Sum from k=0k = 0 up to and including the upper bound for P(X3)P(X \le 3).
    2. Question 2a

      6 marksDistribution of Sample Mean
      Step 1: For XB(8,34)X \sim B(8, \tfrac{3}{4}): E(X)=np=6E(X) = np = 6 and Var(X)=np(1p)=83414=1.5\mathrm{Var}(X) = np(1-p) = 8 \cdot \tfrac{3}{4} \cdot \tfrac{1}{4} = 1.5. Step 2: By the Central Limit Theorem, XˉN ⁣(6,1.5100)=N(6,0.015)\bar{X} \sim N\!\left(6, \dfrac{1.5}{100}\right) = N(6, 0.015), so sd(Xˉ)=0.015=0.1225\mathrm{sd}(\bar{X}) = \sqrt{0.015} = 0.1225. Step 3: Standardise: z=6.260.1225=0.20.1225=1.633z = \dfrac{6.2 - 6}{0.1225} = \dfrac{0.2}{0.1225} = 1.633. Step 4: P(Xˉ6.2)=1Φ(1.633)=10.9488=0.0512P(\bar{X} \ge 6.2) = 1 - \Phi(1.633) = 1 - 0.9488 = 0.0512 (3 s.f.).
      Method:
      Find μ\mu and σ2\sigma^2 for XX, then use XˉN(μ,σ2/n)\bar{X} \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2/n) via the CLT and standardise to get the upper-tail probability.
      Examiner tips
      • Var(Xˉ)=σ2/n\mathrm{Var}(\bar{X}) = \sigma^2/n, not σ2\sigma^2
      • For an upper tail probability, take 1Φ(z)1 - \Phi(z)
    3. Step 1: Sample mean: tˉ=Σtn=275060=45.83345.8\bar{t} = \dfrac{\Sigma t}{n} = \dfrac{2750}{60} = 45.833 \approx 45.8. Step 2: Unbiased variance: s2=1n1 ⁣(Σt2(Σt)2n)=159 ⁣(1270002750260)s^2 = \dfrac{1}{n-1}\!\left(\Sigma t^2 - \dfrac{(\Sigma t)^2}{n}\right) = \dfrac{1}{59}\!\left(127000 - \dfrac{2750^2}{60}\right). Step 3: 2750260=756250060=126041.67\dfrac{2750^2}{60} = \dfrac{7562500}{60} = 126041.67, so the bracket is 127000126041.67=958.33127000 - 126041.67 = 958.33. Step 4: s2=958.3359=16.24316.2s^2 = \dfrac{958.33}{59} = 16.243 \approx 16.2 (3 s.f.).
      Method:
      Compute tˉ=Σt/n\bar{t} = \Sigma t/n, then apply the unbiased variance formula s2=1n1 ⁣(Σt2(Σt)2n)s^2 = \dfrac{1}{n-1}\!\left(\Sigma t^2 - \dfrac{(\Sigma t)^2}{n}\right).
      Examiner tips
      • Always divide by n1n - 1 for an unbiased variance estimate.
      • Compute the bracket Σt2(Σt)2/n\Sigma t^2 - (\Sigma t)^2/n first, then divide once.
    4. Step 1: Hypotheses: H0:μ=45H_0: \mu = 45 vs H1:μ>45H_1: \mu > 45 (one-tailed, upper). Step 2: Test statistic: z=tˉμ0s2/n=45.8334516.243/60=0.8330.2707=0.8330.5203=1.602z = \dfrac{\bar{t} - \mu_0}{\sqrt{s^2/n}} = \dfrac{45.833 - 45}{\sqrt{16.243/60}} = \dfrac{0.833}{\sqrt{0.2707}} = \dfrac{0.833}{0.5203} = 1.602. Step 3: Critical value at 5%5\% for upper tail: zcrit=1.645z_{\text{crit}} = 1.645. Step 4: Compare: 1.602<1.6451.602 < 1.645, so the test statistic is not in the rejection region. Do not reject H0H_0. Step 5: Conclusion: there is insufficient evidence at the 5%5\% level to support the passenger's belief that μ>45\mu > 45.
      Method:
      State hypotheses, compute the zz test statistic, compare with the appropriate critical value, and conclude in context.
      Examiner tips
      • For an upper one-tailed test at 5%5\%, the critical value is 1.6451.645.
      • State the conclusion in context — non-definite language ('insufficient evidence').
    5. Step 1: C=0.4TC = 0.4T is a linear function of TT with a=0.4a = 0.4 and b=0b = 0. Step 2: E(C)=E(0.4T)=0.4E(T)=0.4×15=6E(C) = E(0.4T) = 0.4 \, E(T) = 0.4 \times 15 = 6 dollars. Step 3: Var(C)=Var(0.4T)=0.42Var(T)=0.16×9\mathrm{Var}(C) = \mathrm{Var}(0.4T) = 0.4^2 \, \mathrm{Var}(T) = 0.16 \times 9. Step 4: Var(C)=1.44\mathrm{Var}(C) = 1.44.
      Method:
      Apply E(aT+b)=aE(T)+bE(aT+b) = aE(T)+b and Var(aT+b)=a2Var(T)\mathrm{Var}(aT+b) = a^2 \mathrm{Var}(T) to the linear cost function.
      Examiner tips
      • Variance of aTaT scales by a2a^2, not by aa.
      • Adding a constant does not change variance.
    6. Step 1: T35=i=135CiT_{35} = \sum_{i=1}^{35} C_i where the CiC_i are independent and identically distributed with E(Ci)=6E(C_i) = 6 and Var(Ci)=1.44\mathrm{Var}(C_i) = 1.44. Step 2: Expectation: E(T35)=35E(Ci)=35×6=210E(T_{35}) = 35 \, E(C_i) = 35 \times 6 = 210. Step 3: Variance (of a sum of independents): Var(T35)=35Var(Ci)=35×1.44=50.4\mathrm{Var}(T_{35}) = 35 \, \mathrm{Var}(C_i) = 35 \times 1.44 = 50.4. Step 4: So mean =210= 210 dollars, variance =50.4= 50.4.
      Method:
      Apply linearity of expectation and variance-of-independent-sum to compute total mean and total variance.
      Examiner tips
      • Var(X1+X2++Xn)=nVar(X)\mathrm{Var}(X_1 + X_2 + \ldots + X_n) = n\,\mathrm{Var}(X) when the XiX_i are i.i.d.
      • Be careful: Var(nX)=n2Var(X)\mathrm{Var}(nX) = n^2 \mathrm{Var}(X) — different scenario.
    7. Step 1: For independent Poissons, W+XPo(λW+λX)=Po(3.5)W + X \sim Po(\lambda_W + \lambda_X) = Po(3.5). Step 2: Required probability = P(Y=3)+P(Y=4)+P(Y=5)P(Y = 3) + P(Y = 4) + P(Y = 5) with YPo(3.5)Y \sim Po(3.5). Step 3: Compute each term: P(Y=3)=e3.53.533!=0.21580P(Y=3) = \dfrac{e^{-3.5} \cdot 3.5^3}{3!} = 0.21580; P(Y=4)=e3.53.544!=0.18881P(Y=4) = \dfrac{e^{-3.5} \cdot 3.5^4}{4!} = 0.18881; P(Y=5)=e3.53.555!=0.13217P(Y=5) = \dfrac{e^{-3.5} \cdot 3.5^5}{5!} = 0.13217. Step 4: Sum: 0.21580+0.18881+0.13217=0.53680.5370.21580 + 0.18881 + 0.13217 = 0.5368 \approx 0.537 (3 s.f.).
      Method:
      Combine WW and XX into a single Poisson, then sum probabilities at k=3,4,5k = 3, 4, 5.
      Examiner tips
      • Sum of independent Poissons is Poisson with parameter equal to the sum of parameters.
      • P(aYb)=k=abP(Y=k)P(a \le Y \le b) = \sum_{k=a}^{b} P(Y = k) — list all values.
    8. Step 1: Sum of independent Poissons: SPo(1001.2+2002.3)=Po(580)S \sim Po(100 \cdot 1.2 + 200 \cdot 2.3) = Po(580). With λ\lambda large, approximate by N(580,580)N(580, 580). Step 2: P(S>600)=P(S601)P(S > 600) = P(S \ge 601). With continuity correction, this is P(N600.5)P(N \ge 600.5). Step 3: Standardise: z=600.5580580=20.524.083=0.851z = \dfrac{600.5 - 580}{\sqrt{580}} = \dfrac{20.5}{24.083} = 0.851. Step 4: P(N600.5)=1Φ(0.851)=10.8027=0.19730.197P(N \ge 600.5) = 1 - \Phi(0.851) = 1 - 0.8027 = 0.1973 \approx 0.197 (3 s.f.).
      Method:
      Combine the Poissons, approximate by N(λ,λ)N(\lambda, \lambda), apply continuity correction for the strict inequality, standardise and use the upper tail.
      Examiner tips
      • For large λ\lambda, Po(λ)N(λ,λ)Po(\lambda) \approx N(\lambda, \lambda).
      • Continuity correction: P(X>600)=P(X601)P(N600.5)P(X > 600) = P(X \ge 601) \approx P(N \ge 600.5).
    9. Step 1: Substitute the Poisson p.m.f.: 52eμμ33!+eμμ44!=eμμ55!\dfrac{5}{2} \cdot \dfrac{e^{-\mu}\mu^3}{3!} + \dfrac{e^{-\mu}\mu^4}{4!} = \dfrac{e^{-\mu}\mu^5}{5!}. Step 2: Multiply through by 5!eμμ3\dfrac{5!}{e^{-\mu}\mu^3} to remove eμe^{-\mu} and μ3\mu^3: 521206+12024μ=120120μ2\dfrac{5}{2} \cdot \dfrac{120}{6} + \dfrac{120}{24}\mu = \dfrac{120}{120}\mu^2, which simplifies to 50+5μ=μ250 + 5\mu = \mu^2. Step 3: Rearrange: μ25μ50=0\mu^2 - 5\mu - 50 = 0. Step 4: Factorise: (μ10)(μ+5)=0(\mu - 10)(\mu + 5) = 0, so μ=10\mu = 10 or μ=5\mu = -5. Since μ>0\mu > 0, μ=10\mu = 10.
      Method:
      Substitute the Poisson formula, cancel common factors, and solve the quadratic for μ\mu.
      Examiner tips
      • Factorise out eμμke^{-\mu}\mu^k for the smallest kk to simplify the equation.
      • Reject the negative root because μ\mu is a Poisson parameter.
    10. Step 1: Type II error occurs when H0H_0 is not rejected even though the true p0.25p \ne 0.25. Here, with rejection region X<5X < 5, H0H_0 is not rejected when X5X \ge 5. Step 2: Under the true proportion p=0.10p = 0.10, XB(30,0.1)X \sim B(30, 0.1), so β=P(X5)\beta = P(X \ge 5). Step 3: Compute P(X4)P(X \le 4): (300)(0.9)30=0.04239\binom{30}{0}(0.9)^{30} = 0.04239; (301)(0.1)(0.9)29=0.14130\binom{30}{1}(0.1)(0.9)^{29} = 0.14130; (302)(0.1)2(0.9)28=0.22765\binom{30}{2}(0.1)^{2}(0.9)^{28} = 0.22765; (303)(0.1)3(0.9)27=0.23609\binom{30}{3}(0.1)^{3}(0.9)^{27} = 0.23609; (304)(0.1)4(0.9)26=0.17707\binom{30}{4}(0.1)^{4}(0.9)^{26} = 0.17707. Sum =0.82451= 0.82451. Step 4: β=10.82451=0.17550.175\beta = 1 - 0.82451 = 0.1755 \approx 0.175 (3 s.f.).
      Method:
      Compute the probability of NOT rejecting H0H_0 under the true proportion using the binomial cumulative distribution.
      Examiner tips
      • Type II error uses the TRUE distribution, not the null distribution.
      • Read the rejection region carefully: X<5X < 5 means reject for X4X \le 4, retain for X5X \ge 5.
    11. Step 1: Sample proportion: p^=540=18=0.125\hat{p} = \dfrac{5}{40} = \dfrac{1}{8} = 0.125. Step 2: Standard error: SE=p^(1p^)n=0.125×0.87540=0.002734=0.05229\mathrm{SE} = \sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})}{n}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{0.125 \times 0.875}{40}} = \sqrt{0.002734} = 0.05229. Step 3: Margin of error: 1.96×0.05229=0.102501.96 \times 0.05229 = 0.10250. Step 4: CI: 0.125±0.1025=(0.0225,  0.2275)(0.0225,  0.227)0.125 \pm 0.1025 = (0.0225, \; 0.2275) \approx (0.0225, \; 0.227).
      Method:
      Compute p^\hat{p}, then form the symmetric interval p^±1.96p^(1p^)/n\hat{p} \pm 1.96\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})/n}.
      Examiner tips
      • 95%95\% CI uses z=1.96z = 1.96, not 1.6451.645 (90%90\%) or 2.5762.576 (99%99\%).
      • Always divide p^(1p^)\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) by nn before taking the square root.

    Sit this paper in the app

    Timed mock papers, instant marking and worked solutions for every question, free.

    Practise in the app